These drawbacks can be compounded in a hybrid model, where some procurements are processed through the Procure-to-pay model and others are processed through the Source-to-pay model. This is because the process is more manual and there are more steps that need to be followed. This is because the process is decentralized and there are many different invoices that need to be tracked.Īnother potential disadvantage of the Source-to-pay model is that it can be more time-consuming.

One potential disadvantage of the Procure-to-pay model is that it can be more difficult to track spending. Kingfisher is implementing new Source to Pay (S2P) processes using Coupa. However, there are some disadvantages to consider before making a decision about which sourcing model is best for your business. The Procure-to-pay model can help to improve the efficiency of the procurement process, while the Source-to-pay model can help to ensure that the right suppliers are chosen. Source-to-pay (S2P) is a process that starts with finding, negotiating with, and contracting the supplier of goods, and culminates in final payment for those goods. The Procure-to-pay model can help businesses that have a lot of procurement activity, while the Source-to-pay model can help businesses who want more control over their sourcing process.Īdopting this hybrid model can be advantageous because it allows for the best of both worlds. The combination of Source-to-Pay and Procure-to-Pay models is beneficial because it allows for the strengths of both models to be used.

Source to pay coupa